Multi-source provider feedback

Candid feedback,
before it becomes a peer review.

Patient surveys are everywhere. Colleague feedback almost never is — until something goes wrong. TenorMD gathers structured feedback anonymously from peers, support staff, and referring providers, then turns it into a report you can coach from.

Free on your first two providers · no card required
Barkley Hospitalist Group · Report

Feedback report

Jordan Avery, MD · 14 anonymous responses
Strongly at or above peers 79% rate them at or above peers · 14 responses
Easy to refer patients to Strongest
Sound clinical judgment Strongest
Timely communication back On par
Accessible to discuss a case Developing
Locked until 4 responses
How it works

A feedback program in four steps

Set up in minutes. The anonymity guarantees are built into every step — not bolted on.

1

Add a provider, start a cycle

Pick a reviewer type and review period. Peer, ancillary support, referring provider, or a self-assessment.

2

Invite reviewers anonymously

Single-use links or automated email. Even clinicians at other practices can weigh in on referrals.

3

Responses stay locked

Nothing unlocks until enough people respond — so no individual reviewer can ever be identified.

4

Coach from the report

Peer-comparison standings, distributions, and unattributed themes — with trends that answer “is this provider improving?”

Multi-source by design

Feedback from every angle

Patient surveys see one side. TenorMD gathers structured input from the four groups who actually witness how a provider works — each with a questionnaire built for them.

Peer reviewers

Same or similar specialty — e.g., family practice reviewing primary care
Handoffs contain adequate information
Communicates effectively with other providers
“I would trust this provider to care for my family”

Ancillary & support services

Nursing, lab, pharmacy, case management
Shows respect to other healthcare professionals
Responsive to patient issues
“Avoids discriminatory or abusive language”

Referring providers

PCPs and specialists who refer patients in
It is easy to refer patients to this provider
Communicates findings back in a timely manner
“I intend to continue referring to this provider”

Self-assessment

The provider rates themselves, to compare
I communicate my medical decision-making clearly
I keep my knowledge and skills up to date
“Where do you most want to improve?”

Every questionnaire uses the same anonymous, norm-referenced peer scale — among the strongest … a concern — so results compare cleanly across sources.

Beyond patient surveys

The half your patient surveys can’t see

Patient experience tells you about the visit. It can’t tell you about handoffs, documentation, clinical decision-making, or how a provider works with the team — the things only colleagues witness. TenorMD measures that half, so the two together give you the full picture.

What patient surveys capture

  • Bedside manner during the visit
  • Communication with the patient
  • Wait times and access
  • Overall satisfaction

What only colleagues see

  • Handoffs & sign-outs
  • Documentation clarity
  • Clinical decision-making
  • Teamwork & respect for staff
  • Communication back to referrers

Patient experience and colleague feedback measure different, complementary things — research treats them as distinct, validated instruments. Use both for a complete view of a provider. See the research →

The Reputation Index

The whole picture, at a glance

TenorMD distills every response into a clear, norm-referenced read across six behavioral dimensions — each weighted toward the reviewers best positioned to judge it. See a provider's strengths and blind spots in seconds, and coach from signal instead of noise.

Dr. Jordan Avery, MD · Cardiology Reputation Index · 14 reviewers
82 88th percentile
Clinical competence & judgment
88
Communication & documentation
79
Professionalism & respect
85
Compassion & patient care
72
Teamwork & collaboration
64
Trust & endorsement
49

Six dimensions, source-weighted, with optional cross-organization benchmarking. Norm-referenced and built for coaching, not adverse action. Available on Practice and up.

How anonymity works

Candor depends on trust

Not a privacy policy — a guarantee in the way the system is actually built. Here it is in plain language.

Never linked to you

Your invitation link is single-use. Answers and the link are stored separately, with no field — anywhere — connecting them.

Unlocks only in aggregate

A report stays locked until a minimum number of people respond. Until then, no scores and no comments are shown to anyone.

Aggregates only, always

Reports and exports contain standings, percentages, and unattributed comments — never individual response records.

Built for growth

TenorMD is built for coaching — clear, candid feedback a leader can use to help providers improve over time.

Pricing

Start free. Upgrade when it’s a program.

Per organization. Reviewers are always free and unlimited.

Free
$0

Prove the value on a provider or two.

  • Up to 2 providers reviewed
  • All 4 reviewer types
  • Unlimited reviewers per cycle
  • Email invitations (25 per cycle)
  • Full single-cycle report
  • Anonymous + aggregate-only with response threshold
Start free
Group
Custom

For health systems and multi-site groups.

  • Unlimited providers & admins
  • Everything in Practice
  • Cross-provider benchmarking
  • SSO (SAML / OIDC)
  • Priority support
Instant quote

* Practice at $89/mo reflects the annual plan (billed $1,068/year). The 6-month term is $149/mo and month-to-month is $249/mo. See full pricing →

Be the best version of the team

See the blind spots, before they escalate

Start a free review cycle on one provider today. No card, no setup call — just candid feedback that helps everyone grow.